Friday, 7 June 2019

5 JUne 2019 | Print & PDI of the Year Competition | Judge: Marie-Ange Bouchard



It was déjà vu, all over again! This was our annual Print & PDI of the Year Competition, with the opportunity to enter two of your favourite PDIs and two favourite prints that had been previously submitted to any of the externally-judged Club Competitions this membership year. We were delighted to welcome back Marie-Ange Bouchard as judge – not least because of her beautiful French accent and because female judges are somewhat of a rarity at Photocraft.

There were 23 PDIs and 19 prints and this was probably the hardest competition of the year to judge. I guess no one would have submitted images that hadn’t scored well originally. So, the judge was left with the unenviable task of selecting from a feast of fine photos. She especially appreciated the variety of genres represented, including the challenging genre of street photography.

Her commentary and judgements were hugely entertaining and laced with a good deal of humour. I especially enjoyed her mixed metaphor when commenting on Steve H’s highly commended image: ‘the boat is the cherry on the cake’! I don’t know whether it was because we had so many excellent images or whether she is, by nature or training, an affirmative, positive, and constructive judge, but I do wish all judges would follow her example. Her comments were peppered with ‘I admire…’, ‘I love…’, ‘I enjoy very much…’ and even her (rare) critical remarks were gentle and edifying: ‘It would be really great if…’, ‘Do we need…?’, ‘I’m not 100% sure about…’, ‘What bothers me is…’.

It was clear what the judge appreciated: things such as, triangles, an odd number of subjects, shadow details, space for the subject to move into, simplicity, a limited colour palette, sufficient contrast, nothing that was too bright to draw the eye away from the subject, and the reduction in busyness in black and white (note to self: remember this next time she judges at Photocraft!). Essentially, however, most of the time she was simply explaining why the photos were so good.

The photos were not scored, simply highly-commended or declared the winner. I sometimes wonder whether our competitions would be better without scores. Arguably, scoring forces judges to find fault and justify their lower marks, rather than appreciating the finer points of every image. I recognise this is a highly contentious issue, which, I’m told, has divided camera groups right down the centre (à la B -- x - t !, so I’m told), but I wonder whether it would be worth starting a discussion about the pros and cons. Why not respond to this blog with your opinions, in the comments box?

This week the competition wasn’t divided into the usual two levels. So, it was especially impressive that two of the highly commended entries in the PDI competition were from level one entrants. There was a particularly long reflective pause before the judge announced the winners each time – not, I suspect, to increase the dramatic tension, but because she was genuinely conflicted by the very high standard of entries.


Tonight's winners and highly commended entries: 

PDI Winner

Juvenile Starlings - Aerial Attack | Mandy B

 PDI highly commended entries

The Outsider | Martin F
Sea Dream | Steve H
Fisherman | David H
Fountain of Youth | Darren M

Print Winner

Chalet Man - Flight to Simplicity| David H

Print highly commended entries

Goldfinch Collecting Nesting | Mandy B
Portland Bill Lighthouse | Brian C
The Happiness Trap | Martin F
Head over Heels | David H
Frankie Dettori Wins Again | Dave S
Many congratulations to the photographers of these outstanding PDIs and Prints of 2019!





4 comments:

  1. Another great Blog, Philip - well done. On the question of the "Pointless System" of scoring competitions, you may remember that I proposed adopting this at the AGM in 2016. According to the minutes of this meeting (available in the Members' Area of the website), it was rejected by the members (12 voted for no change, 4 for adoption, and 5 in favour of consulting with some judges).

    It was difficult to go through the arguments at such a meeting, but anyone interested in the pros and cons can read an article about it in a recent issue of the PAGB eNews http://www.pagbnews.co.uk/sites/default/files/newsletters/en%20231%2001%20June%202019.pdf. This includes suggestions for overcoming the problem we would have in determining the overall winners and runners-up in the season's competitions.
    Hopefully, the idea will gain some traction among members when they consider the arguments more carefully.
    So, déjà vu, all over again...again!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great blog Philip and some wonderfully descriptive phrases. Tres Bon!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Re the question raised by Philip in his entertaining and comprehensive commentary of the evening’s events, I enter pictures in club competitions to get a critical analysis of my images; a second opinion of my ‘masterpiece’, even if I may sometimes disagree with the comments made.

    Half the fun of watching a competition is to second guess what score the judge may award. Like a football match, contentious decisions on scoring are part of the ‘game’ and I think the evenings would become rather tame if this aspect were removed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. We all know it’s a game Dave, but it’s the reverse of what happens in football. It isn’t the referee who determines the score in a football match, it’s the players.

    I think the main argument for a ‘pointless’ scoring system is that with the present system, judges spend too much time looking for ‘faults’ in pictures in order to deduct points and arrive at a score. Instead, they should be spending the time considering what the photographer was trying to achieve and how successful they were in doing that.

    ReplyDelete