Monday, 27 May 2019

22nd May 2019 - INTENTIONAL CAMERA MOVEMENT (Or Brgrgrg Blrargg, Pfpffppffpf and Dddddddde)

Hello all,

Forgive the delay in posting this blog. I spent the weekend looking up how to spell the very descriptive words used by some of our members to explain how they took their Intentional Camera Movement (ICM) shots that we all enjoyed last Wednesday evening, 22nd May.

A very big thank you to David P for setting up this "show and tell" which was a follow-up to David's introduction to ICM back in October last year.

There were a healthy 53 images from 11 members for all to enjoy and a simple alphabetical order was chosen for who went when.

We started with Mark B. He admitted straight away that it was only when we had the ICM intro evening last year that Mark first heard of this photographic method. His selection of images came mainly from New York City (for anyone visiting NYC, Mark's big tip is to head to the top of the Rockefeller Center for the best views, unimpaired by a glass surround, especially to capture the evening lights) and Switzerland - here it was all about tunnels. Mark said he found it easier to to take this type of image at night as gauging the right shutter speed was far more straightforward than in daylight, when he found most attempts were too bright.

The general consensus was that Mark's image "Crazy, Man" was worthy of a commendation. So here it is:


























We can thank Mark for his technical explanation of how he took this. And I quote:
"I just went Brgrgrg, Blrargg) Apologise for any misspelling of this detailed summary 😁

Mandy B took us among the trees at Polesden Lacey. She claimed to be "just playing about" and produced some well-balanced examples. She shared her secret to what we saw as simply going ",Pfpffppffpf". 

Her "Horse Chestnut" image gave us a good range of colour to enjoy. Contrary to that was her "Through the Trees 2". This was described as having an "ominous background".

Your author was up next. I chose images which gave examples of both horizontal and vertical movement. My aim was to get a balance of colours, especially where I could take the tulips in bloom in the Munich Botanical Gardens earlier this month. 

Anne H set out to experiment in the style of one of our past guest speakers, Polina Plotnikova. She took time to lay out her flowers on the kitchen table, using a picnic rug for a backdrop. Seeking both movement and clarity, Anne used shutter speeds of around 2 seconds and "juddered" the camera, explaining thus, "I just went Dddddddde". No post-processing and a simple vignette and border as added features produced what we saw on the evening.

Anne also covered Steve H's images. These gave us more fine examples of capturing light and creating movement in the shot. We also had Steve's "essence of tulip" image - a very subtle work.

Alan M could not make it but did provide a selection of images to view. These offered a range of techniques such as intentional zoom with a telephoto lens, twisting the camera during the exposure and also a great attempt at capturing light movement; Alan spelling out his name with his phone and setting up his camera to get this in the one shot.

David M followed with other examples of intentional zoom and "twirling" his camera during the shot. He admitted that he had over 100 attempts to get something that he was happy with and that he certainly did with his "Tyrells Wood" shot:




The gold background was deemed a great success, adding depth to the shot and making it worthy of inclusion here.

David P took us into another area, this being multiple exposures. His camera settings offer this option and simply divides the selected shutter speed among the number of images chosen. David told us that you can have the shutter set to take the shots in continuous mode or control that aspect yourself. Whatever is chosen, the trick is to keep moving the camera.

Chris R was another who said he had taken many, many images whilst experimenting with ICM. He gave us some wonderful examples from a trip to Farthing Down as well as simply using the lights in his garden. The best of the bunch was where he chose to move the camera in line with the path in the picture, giving us "Follow the path up the hill" to enjoy:




Philip R also could not make it along but submitted some images. These were, by his own admission, mainly produced using Photoshop. In this case, it was one where it was felt that the time playing and experimenting with the camera would probably give more consistent results that post-processing.

Dave S took us into his post process world with examples of trees being made into mirror images so as to create a final overall effect of a spider and its web. He did say that the outcome was more blurred that he thought.

Dave also provided a nice image of two dogs running along the beach. I was all too familiar with his explanation of that shot; he had been taking slow shutter speed images of a waterfall and simply forgot to change the settings! I for one did like the outcome with the dogs being captured running at full speed really well.

Always one to experiment, another of Dave's images was taken on an escalator. However, the trick here was that he had not moved the camera at all, but worked with the movement of the escalator! This produced a good image but Dave said he almost fell off at the top as he was so focused on the shot.

To end, we had a selection of images that had been brought along on the night. 

There was one more from Anne H. Anne was rightly delighted that she had mastered Photoshop to blend two images of tennis balls, fully capturing the "Boing" of the bouncing ball.

Graham showed us some images taken whilst he had rotated the camera. These had some very sharp and in focus centres and featured both his garden and his dog as the subjects.

To close, David P gave us some examples of the various filters and adapters that can be bought in order to create the slower shutter speeds needed when trying ICM in daylight.

There are of course kits out there for over £100 but for starting out, this simple "Andoer" ten stop screw-in filter is under £13. Make sure you choose the right size for your lens.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Andoer-82mm-ND1000-10-Stop-Fader-Neutral-Density-Filter-for-Nikon-Canon-SLR-C3L2/183790891559?epid=16013114855&hash=item2acaca7227:g:TKsAAOSwMupcw37C

There are now also many apps for smartphones that will calculate the required shutter speed to use with filters of this sort. These are available from both the Apple App Store and Google Play and are from Lee Filters (Lee Stopper App), ND Filter Calc and ND Filter Timer.

Once again, a big thanks to David P for all the time he put into the two parts of this introduction to ICM. I recommend this to all as something to try. Just experiment and see what you produce. I think it can be most rewarding. 






Saturday, 18 May 2019

Monochrome Print Competition 2, 15th May 2019

Our judge for the final contest of the year was Roger Mendham LRPS DPAGB of Bookham Camera Club. He began by saying that this was the fourth monochrome competition he had been asked to judge recently, much to his bemusement. He claimed not to be an expert on monochrome although he had been to several outstanding exhibitions of black and white photos this year and was beginning to appreciate it more. He had read the club’s rules for monochrome which he praised for their clarity (they were actually lifted from the FSLPS rules!).

As there was not a massive number of entries, Roger was able to spend time considering and co+mmenting on each print. For him, to get top marks the picture had to be sound both compositionally and technically. Failings in one or other would seriously reduce his scoring.

The winner at Level 1 was Steve with Gridiron, an exceptional, almost abstract picture of scaffolding, so congratulations Steve. Steve and Alan were neck and neck on the leader board, and so it remains after the final round - but Steve just pips it to the trophy by two plus points. What a nail-biter that must have been.


The 10+ at Level 2 was given to David P with A Space to Work, The Natural History Museum. Thanks Anne for suggesting Hogwarts as a better title.


Congratulations to David H for the other 10, Head over Heels. Not the first very effective overhead shot from David I remember - has he invested in a drone, I wonder.


Apart from the winning pictures, there were two notable portraits at this Level.

The first, cryptically entitled Omani Scout, The Empty Quarter by (and of?) David H. The subject, whose turban and shirt looked sandblasted from many a desert storm, looked curiously familiar. Hmmm...


The second, Sleepwalker by David P, the judge turned this way and that under the light, I swear for a good 5 minutes, as he tried to work out whether the subjects eyes were open or closed. Frustrated, in the end, he decided it ‘wasn’t a good portrait’ and gave it a token score of 7. It's included here for you to make up your own mind about the eyes!


And now the painful part, offering my hearty congratulations to Brian C whose two 9.5 scores of the evening meant he had toppled me from the lead position and earning him the year’s Monochrome Print Trophy. Well done Brian, and well deserved.

Some older club members may remember the person who donated this shield - Rita Smith. Rita was a lively and a lovely lady who made a great contribution to the club during the many years of membership. It was with great sadness that we learnt that she passed away this week at the age of 89. On behalf of Photo Craft, I would like to offer our condolences to her family and to the many friends who will miss and remember her.

Friday, 3 May 2019

Open Print Competition 4 - 1st May 2019

SIZE IS IMPORTANT!!!

We welcomed back Jay Charnock as our judge for our final open print competition of the season. Jay is always welcome with her down to earth, honest and straightforward advice and comments and once again did not disappoint with her opening thoughts.

For Jay, it is the whole presentation that is important. As she puts it, the photographer is giving Jay their unique view of the world, as seen through their eyes. Within the image, she is looking for an individual expression full of passion, feelings and emotions. 

Jay will not get hung up on the usual photographic "rules" such as thirds, odd numbers and focal points. Her good friend, Henri Cartier-Bresson, stated that "sharpness is a bourgeois concept", so for Jay, a beautiful image of any type is justification enough for entering the photograph!

As she went through the images, her comments were always interesting. "Be careful with your titles as they should be a guide to the image." She felt that one or two photographs did not represent what the title promised.

Similarly, the size of the print in the mount is important. Not too big and not too small is the mantra here and of course, the bigger the image, the more the flaws will be noticed!

There were many other nuggets of advice offered throughout the evening  and in order to keep this read a short one for all of you, I list a few more here:


  • HAVE THE IDEA, THEN TAKE THE IMAGE
  • THINK BEYOND THE OBVIOUS
  • DO NOT OVERSHARPEN
  • BE CAREFUL OF UNDEREXPOSURE - ESPECIALLY WITH "SHINY" WATER
  • TAKE CARE WITH PRINTING
  • BALANCE THE PRINT SIZE AND THE MOUNT FOR BEST IMPACT
  • MAKE IT YOUR PICTURE!
For our Level 1 group, we had our only three entries of the night from Alan M. His top score of 10 was given for this great picture of HMS Belfast, titled "STANDING PROUD".


Jay commented that it would make a perfect postcard for London. Very well lit with the emphasis on the Union Flag, immediately bringing the eye into the image. The dark sky is exactly right to highlight Tower Bridge and the overall balance of the light and colour make the image the top scorer in Level 1.

Level 2 saw 26 entries with 8 held back.

The overall 10+ winner was this terrific shot by Mandy B, titled "GOLDFINCH COLLECTING NESTING"



Jay loved the clarity and sharpness in the photograph, with every detail of the goldfinch and its mouthful of nesting material brought to life against a simple and effective background. To me, it looks like the bird is creating a great impression of the old handlebar moustache! Well done Mandy!

Our two other 10s on the night were from the writer of this week's blog...er, me.

I was chuffed to hear Jay provide some very nice comments about both as being good examples of abstract work, with no single focal point in either image but working overall. Keeping it simple was another piece of good advice from Jay.

The first 10 was for "TIDAL EFFECTS"



The second was for "PORTLAND BILL LIGHTHOUSE"




Overall, this was an enjoyable and informative evening. I, for one, look forward to her next visit to Photocraft.