This week’s judge was David Harford, who told us he has enjoyed taking
monochrome photos ever since he was eleven years old. His passion for
monochrome was clearly evident, as was his generosity and determination to highlight
the positive aspects of our entries.
All judges have their particular preferences or hobby horses. People
sometimes try to identify these in advance. This can sometimes backfire though,
as, if you deliberately play to the judge’s preferences, you need to do it extremely well!
I thought it might be interesting to try to discover some
of David’s preferences, as revealed in this week’s judging. So, in no
particular order, here goes -
Good images (and some of this applies beyond monochrome) should:
be simple | be better in monochrome than in colour | have good contrast | make you think | have good actual black and white somewhere | have fifty (or more!) shades of grey... or sepia | crop out distractions | not be burnt out | not have light areas at the edge | have something of interest in the brightest area | have differential focusing, with the background thrown out of focus | have a level horizon | have a darker base to the image | have lighter areas nearer the top | have enough, but not too many, people | make you think about the relationship between human subjects | have oomph! | have dynamism | lose any bland areas | have eyes in focus | have the focal point crystal sharp | have leading lines to draw the gaze | be taken at the subject’s level | be taken close in | have a dark vignette | be uncluttered | not have too much in focus | have strong diagonals | … & even more I didn’t manage to capture!
But, intriguingly, this didn’t necessarily help us predict
the eventual winners of levels 1 & 2. The winning entry in level 1 was a
stunning landscape picture, with little contrast but an amazing array of shades
of grey. The level 2 winner, on the other hand, was a beautiful ‘contrejour’
image of a couple of people on a bench, with a well-controlled ‘high key’
background. They were very well-deserved
winners, but it just shows that you can seldom second-guess judges!
These were the highest scoring entries (10 & above) -








No comments:
Post a Comment